Here’s ‘Ethereum’s biggest problem with L2s’ – Polygon CEO

[ad_1]

Blast and Base have heightened competitors throughout the Ethereum L2 area.
Polygon CEO sees L2 competitors as dangerous for Ethereum.

Up to now, Ethereum’s [ETH] layer (L2s) ecosystem has been dominated by Arbitrum [ARB] and Optimism [OP].

Nonetheless, the entry of Coinbase L2 resolution Base and Blast has heightened additional competitors. Proper now, Optimism is quantity 4 by way of Whole Worth Locked (TVL).

Blast and Base are within the second and third spots, with $1.67B and $1.45B in TVL, respectively.

L2s have been designed to boost Ethereum scalability, however the area is overheated in the meanwhile. In keeping with Marc Boiron, CEO of Polygon [MATIC], the cut-throat competitors in L2 is “Ethereum’s largest drawback.”

Boiron stated;

“Ethereum’s largest drawback is cannibalizing itself constantly through all L2s competing over devs, customers and liquidity slightly than competing exterior of the Ethereum ecosystem.”

Ethereum fragmentation drawback

L2s have been Vitalik Buterin’s roadmap to fixing the Ethereum scaling drawback. Nonetheless, the strategy has unintentionally led to liquidity fragmentation walled off from every L2.

Boiron sees the issue as extending to competitors between customers and builders, too. The overheating within the area simply makes it worse.

In keeping with CoinShares, a digital asset supervisor agency, fixing the Ethereum fragmentation drawback may enhance consumer expertise, share liquidity, and “bridge-less bridging.”

Some L2s have opted for interoperable roll-up protocols to handle these points. Polygon has its Aggregation Layer (AggLayer), whereas Arbitrum has Orbit as Optimism leverage its Superchain.

Nonetheless, the CoinShares report notes that regardless of these interoperable protocols, the problem nonetheless stays as a result of totally different technical approaches,